
|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | |
#1.
Being a professional pilot for these past 25 years has kept me mildly in tune
with the cause and effect of aircraft accidents. It has also allowed me to experience
many varied and unusual events while airborne. Take
this evening's flight for example: While returning to the San Francisco bay
area, level at 24,000 feet, I was shocked to see a bright green flame streak
earthward, seemingly inches in front of my cockpit. Of course, I had just experienced
a near-miss by a meteorite.
What do you suppose the chances are that a white-hot meteorite sailed right
through the thin aluminum skin of TWA's flight 800, and ignited the fuel-air
mixture in the center tank of that 747? Right now, I'm thinking that in light
of no proof of terrorism on that flight, the chances are pretty good.
Sincerely,
Michael A. Smith
A friend of mine was curious about the crash of Flt#800. His
question is has anybody investigated the possibility of a missle that was unarmed
hitting the aircraft causing the crash.
My husband is on the USS Grapple.
Where is the best source to get information about the Grapple as well as the
investigation?
Is the NTSB still having briefings on CNN and when are they scheduled?
Thank you
Mrs. Heather L. Seibert Racine
The following information about TWA Flight 800 was received on the afternoon
of 8/22/96. TWA flight 800 was shot down by a U.S. Navy guided missile ship
which was in area W-105. W-105 is a Warning Area off the Southeast coast of
Long Island and is used by the military for missile firing and other military
operations. Guided missile ships travel all over the world defending the US
and they were conducting practice firings up over the top of a Navy P-3 radar
plane who was on a Southwest heading about over the top of TWA 800. Evidently
the missile is supposed to go over the top of the P-3 and the accuracy of the
missile is being measured by instrumentation in the P-3. There was a USAir flight
coming from the Southeast descending towards Providence, RI that had been cleared
to 21,000 feet and the TWA 800 aircraft was restricted to 13,000 feet. The air
traffic controller requested the USAir flight to turn on his landing lights
with the idea that TWA might see his lights and identify him. At that point,
he would clear the TWA flight to continue his climb. The P-3 was a non-beacon
target (transponder OFF) flying southwest in the controlled airspace almost
over TWA 800 and made NO calls to ATC. After the explosion, he continued his
flight to the west and then called ATC and asked if they would like him to turn
around and assist with the –accident.” You will remember that the first announcement
about this accident came form the Pentagon. The spokesman mentioned that they
were sending the Navy to the crash site. They immediately sent a Navy Captain
who was replaced the next day by an Admiral. That Admiral is still on the scene.
The FBI has conducted at least 3,000 eyewitness interviews and the NTSB has
not been able to be a part of these interviews and not have any access to the
contents of them. Some of those eyewitnesses reported seeing lights. Those were
probably the landing lights of the USAir plane. It has been a cover-up from
the word go. The NTSB is there in name ONLY. All announcements made by Mr. Bob
Francis say absolutely nothing, and notice that the FBI is always standing beside
or behind Mr. Francis and it would appear that his job is to make sure that
nothing is said that would give away –THE BIG SECRET!” It is time to end this
farce and tell the public the real truth as to what happened to TWA 800. My
source shall remain my own but the above information is true and I believe it
will all become known soon, now that all of you know the real truth. end.
pogie@flourgarden.com (pogie)
I was on Flight 800 Sunday July 14 with my wife to begin our honeymoon in
Paris. We sat on the plane for over four hours during the tail-end of hurricane
Bertha as mechanics replaced a hydraulic in one of the engines. Does anyone
know if we were on the same plane that went down or if this information has
any value?
Scott Collins
or
About 1983 or 84 or so the Navy and in particular Naval Air Warfare Center
Indianapolis and Patuxent River did a major study on the effects of different
types of wire insulation and in particular how the insulation responds to electrical
shorts.
Flight 800 was wired with KAPTON wire. To understand how Kapton wire in a
fuel cell could cause a major explosion, one only has to read the final reports
published by the Navy. As a result of the study the Navy purged Kapton insulated
wire from all its maintenance facilities. Was there a Kapton short that caused
an explosion in the center fuel tank?
Chuck McIntyre
I just heard on CNN that the investigation has centered on an explosion of
the center fuel tank. Re-construction has suggested that there was no external
bomb or missle that caused the tank to explode. Suppose someone was to put a
bomb inside the tank, that either would be encapsulated that would desolve over
a period of time and then explode either by chemical reaction or by some sort
of electrical detection method. The bomb would not have to be very big just
big enough to hold the electonics, or some chemical that once explosed to oxygen
or jet fuel would ignite. Naturally, timing would be very difficult, but still
possible if it encapsulated so it wouldn't desolve but would explode after a
certain pressure or time point was reached. A bomb like this could have been
deposited in the tank during maintenace anywhere in the world and at any time
preceding the explosion even months. The device, being small and right in the
middle of the explosion could have been totally consumed.
Well, that's might thoughts on the current thinking, hope it helps.
Sincerely,
Carlton Simmons
Dave,
I am a Electrical Engineer for at a Nuclear Power plant and today I was in
a class on "Failure Analysis" conducted by a very prestigous enginering firm
located in the Boston area. The instructor was a engineer specializing in polymers
and he was involved in the analysis of the TWA 800 wreckage. In his words, on
the day after the crash a piece of wreckage was retrieved and sent to him for
analysis. His analysis revealed that two polymers were found on the wreakage.
The polymers were rocket fuel that is only used on Military style multi-stage
missles. The type of polymers that he found would not have been used by a bomb
maker nor would they be expected to be found on a commercial jet. It seems that
our goverment is hiding and covering up this information probably for political
reasons.
Do you have any information regarding TWA 800 subsequent to the Sallinger
statements to Associated Press? I would really appreciate any info you have.
Re: TWA 800 and missile theory. During the mid 80's I was the insurance broker
that provided insurance on a research aircraft flown by a highly trained crew.
This aircraft dissappeared without a trace off the California coast near an
airspace warning area W-412. Because the military is know to fire missiles in
the area we questioned them on the possibilities. They responded with complete
denial and refused to release radar information that may have been helpfull
in finding the answers for the families. When the government denies one must
assume they are covering up something. Their record speaks for itself.
I believe flight 800 was destroyed by being struck by a fairly large object;
either a re-entering orbiting object or a meteoroid. My opinion is based on
something I saw at 8:39pm on the evening of the disaster.
gbarnes
I am not seeing much on the WEB anymore about the fact that it still is entirely
possible that there is a huge coverup about the Navy training ship that was
out at sea, seen by witnesses on the day of the horrible crash/explosion/disaster......I
am the daughter of a TWA pilot whose life has forever been altered since this
terrible tragedy occured....There is a lot of interesting information about
radar files missing for that night only, and other records missing having to
do with the Navy for that night only.....again, why are all the slooths and
bloodhounds ignoring these facts, and why are the masses seeking to pinpoint
the cause as a terrorist attack, or faulty mechanics......we live in a world
where the truth often is stranger than fiction......I wish people would speak
up and not be afraid to find the truth, even if it means our own government
is accidently responsible.....I don't know anything but what airline professionals
discuss, and what they say and what the news reports are saying are usually
different......I just don't hear anyone pushing for what could really be the
ugly truth......I fear it too.......I just want to believe the best of my country........
Dear Sir; A while ago I saw a military demonstration of a CO2 or other laser
on television. The effect upon the metal plate of the beam was very destructive.
Given that flight paths are specific and ordinary, could a laser be set up on
shore in preparation for an overflying aircraft? What kind of hole would be
made in an aircraft fuselage such as a 747 using such a device? I see on television
today that the sky was remarkably clear and a comment was made about the sunset
on July 17, 1996. Visual ranging would not have been a problem. I am not an
expert but considering the numbers of flights with empty center tanks sitting
on the ground in the hot tropics, and the 8-11 minutes duration, in cooler air,
of the 800 flight, it would be surprising this type of disaster had not occurred
previously. Was there someone specific on board? My comment
-Richard Small
I have never felt right about the information/misinformation on TWA Flight
800. I have just read Mr. Sander's book, "The Downing of TWA Flight 800". I
believe him to be credible. The only people we have disputing the friendly fire
missile theory are the FBI, the NTSB and the Pentagon who have been proven to
be untrustworthy many times. To mention a few times, we have Vietnam and the
agent orange controversy, the Desert Storm sickness, bomb test here in Nevada
where troops were used as guinea pigs and ash falling on people from the tests,
the syphylis study using black people as guinea pigs, even the misinformation
being published on air bags, and the list goes on.
I think it is time the government cleaned up its act, quit treating the citizens
like their private property to use and abuse, and be honest for a change.
Sincerely,
Norma Weiler Hi,
I have been following the crash since 8:30 July 17, 1996. I was watching a
show, when they stopped it to make the announcment. Ever since, I have been
following it. I wish I can help in some way, but I don't know how. I had no
relation to any of the victims, but it is just so upsetting to hear about it.
I am so sorry that it happened and I send my condolences to the families of
all the victims of the crash. How can I help with anything?
Thanks,
Mika Tomczak I realize that everyone has a theory, but please hear me out. I don't necessarily
want to be right, but then it still won't bring back all those loved ones anyway.
I just have one nagging thought that has stuck with me since the night the
news flash came over concerning TWA 800. I have tried to find a place to post
my theory, not to be so much heard, but considered.
The witnesses (as best as I recall) all seemed to say the same basic thing.
""" I heard a loud thunderous boom, like pyrotechnics, fire works, thunder,
etc.. and I looked up and saw a giant fireball flash in the sky."""""" and it
goes on from there.
Does anybody see a problem here, or did I miss something,?
The plane was approximately 5 to 8 miles off shore, if I am accurate, and
these people heard it explode in time to look up and see it go in a large fireball????
What happened to the speed of light, versus the speed of sound ?
If a loud explosion occurs that far off shore, and the witnesses are on or
near the beach, that plane should have been almost in the ocean by the time
they heard it blow up.
I think the noise they heard as it hit water, was the impact sound which was
actually delayed report from altitude, not pieces hitting water. Keep thinking
time sequence, what did they look at while they listened ?
I wonder if a missile was launched from some point closer to land than the
plane, allowing the high speed,(but probably not mach speed) missile to hit
the plane at the same time it's launch was heard back on land.
That is the only way I can imagine a noise on land coinciding with an explosion
several miles out.
I would welcome any comments on my thoughts, Thank you for your time.
Sincerely, Have you read the book "The Downing of TWA Flight 800" by James Sanders? There
seems to be some good evidence that an accidental missle hit brought down the
airplane.
I heard on a recent edition of the Michael Reagan program that the FBI is
going to arrest both James Sanders and his wife over the publication of the
above book.
I don't believe the reports are necessarily true or fiction. The United States
Gov't only tells the truth if it serves the purpose of whatever weasely burecrat
is in charge of the information. Maybe in fifty years we'll know. One of the theories put forth was that a faulty fuel pump in the center tank
(empty) sparked the heated fuel vapors and caused an explosion. Why on earth
would a fully loaded 747 leave New York for a trans-Atlantic flight with an
empty tank? If the 747 is like other large jets, the center tank is a "clearing
house" for all fuel that is strategically pumped into it from the wings so as
to balance the fuel load and maintain stability of the aircraft. You would think
a plane set for a trans oceanic flight would be "packed to the gills" with fuel??????
While at the Calverton hanger for the 1st anniversary an FBI agent said to
me when I asked him why he thought that a missile was not involved. Well the
satelite image shows no missile. I asked him why the families while at the hotel
were told that no satelite images existed of the event. He quickly responded
that he could not really discuss anything further about the satelite images
due to national security.
Website owner's note: At the request of the sender of the
preceding e-mail, I have not disclosed the name or e-mail address. If you have
any info. on satellite images, please e-mail
me.
My question: Has anyone ever reported any information about USAir Flight 3684
from Baltimore to MacArthur (Islip, Long Island) Airport the evening of March
17, 1996 -- four months to the day before TWA Flight 800 went down? Just after
dark, the plane was beginning its approach to MacArthur, when there was an explosion
just forward of the tip of the right wing -- a ball of bright orange that appeared
from inside the plane to be about 20 feet in diameter, followed by a concussion
that shook the plane. Everyone looked at everyone else: "What the hell was that?"
No announcement from the cockpit. As we got off the plane, we asked the flight
attendant, who didn't have a clue. Next day and on several occcasions afterwards,
I sought information from the airline, the media, the FBI (Sorry, we can't comment
on that, Ma'am). What happened? I could never find out. Does anyone know? If
so, please refer me to sources.
How does the possibility of a laser weapon piercing the skin and igniting the
fuel tanks sound? Using technology similar to what the government is working
on for stopping incoming missile attacks by burning a hole in the missile, exposing
it's fuel and ultimately causing it to explode prior to it's destination. Just
a thought.
After the crash, there were several reports of near misses between military
and commercial airliners. There were two off the coast of Florida, and several
off the east coast.
My thought is the military jets were shadowing the airliners, since all military
fighters are equipped with missile detection and countermeasure systems. This
operation was possibly enacted to protect selected commercial flights.
As a Major in the USAF, and a fighter pilot, I have no direct knowledge of
this. But I do have several pilots in my unit that were transferred out at this
time for a special operation.
Food for thought
The e-mail address and name of this person have been ommitted.
I read a number of the comments about TWA 800 and noticed that the great majority
are about the cause that brought the plane down. I am writing as the mother
of a 19 year old young man who was killed on that flight. I am having such a
hard time moving on. I have been able to go back to work (altho it did take
me 3 yrs) but I still can't sleep at night until very late, the depression come
in huge waves and I miss him so much that at times it hurts to breathe. Thank
G-d I have another son, who is 21 months older. He seems to be distancing himself
from me. Maybe my pain is too hard for him to handle, I don't know because he
won't say. I try very hard to behave as if everything is okay when I'm with
him but the truth is that everything is not okay. No one seems to want to talk
about my son that was killed. It makes me feels as if he has been forgotten.
I have explained to everyone that I would appreciate it if they would talk about
him from time to time. But, they don't. I would like some advice from someone
out there who, unfortunately, has gone thru a similar experience. If not, please,
don't respond. Thank you.
#2
#3
#4
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
#14
nweiler@equinox.unr.com
Onespin@worldnet.att.net
Bryan Sizelove
sizelov@si-net.com
Kurt Brandon
kurtbo2@aol.com
#18
Dr. Judy
#19
NJensen662@aol.com
#20
#25 (Thursday, August 24, 2000)
I have only a few comments: 1. Why was the crew of the navy ship in the area taken for a two day debrifing and forced to sign documents that would cost them their freedom if they ever spoke of this incident to anyone....2. Why was the findings from the University of Florida dimissed when it found that the residue on the seat cusions was that of solid rocket fuel type used by missils....3. Why don't the TV stations ABC or NBC the two that showed the footage of a orange smoke trail that led directly up to the 747 and imploded just before the jet exploded.....I have a copy of the Today program that aired the day after the downing of flight 800 and it shows that this was not an accident but some type of missil or similar item caused this plane to explode...4. Why did the FBI or the NTSB not demand that all 747's be grounded until they could find out why this happened...cud it be because they new why this plane came down and was not worried about the safety of the other 747's I wonder?? This is just another tragady that our government for the people by the people won't let the people know the real truth....are they really that stupid that they feel we can't handle it.....I guess this will be like the coverup of the Kennedy assassination....since it seems our government took part in that too.......I wish to express my deepest sympathys to the families friends and loved ones that have suffered from the tragedy of this TWA flight 800 and I wish you all had the truth, it can't bring them back but could help bring closure to this issue.
# 26 (Monday, October 2, 2000)
After reading Sander's book " The Downing of TWA 800" It certainly seems clear to me that the impossible coverup that I thought could never succeed has indeed! What -if anything- can the average citizen do besides cringe in fear when we fly again?? Will i be the next victim of a wayward standard missle? Will ,my friends or family?? What action can we take that will not get us imprisoned for life?? Accountability in any bureaucracy is the most difficult task in the world. Everyone is so invested in covering their own rear ends so that they can protect their careers, the real truth NO matter how important to everyone is the last thing served. My sincere wishes go out to the Sanders' who have courageously stood out from this stew of cowardice and fear to help shed light on what is definitely another black mark on our nation's government.