PRACTICAL
CHESS ENDGAME
*www.chessending.com*
Editor: Brian Gosling
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
I have decided to add further endings to
the site on a monthly basis. The new position
will appear at the beginning of each new month. You are invited to solve it.
I will be pleased to
receive feedback
about the positions and the analysis. The solution will be published
the following month with the new position. Some of these positions
will come from actual historical games. Others will be composed
endgame studies, but they will be relevant to the practical game. The
site has over 400 chess endings and endgame studies and and has been running for over
seven years. An explanation of the different types of endings is
given below. Thanks for your support.
A database of chess
endings.
Thanks to Antonio Senatore.
THIS MONTH
POSITION 364
White to play and WIN
FEN:2k5/1p1b1B2/p1p1p2p/K1P1Pp2/PP6/6P1/7P/8 w - - 0
1:
It is good training to try initially to
solve the endings without the assistance of a chess playing
programme.
Solution for the above,
plus new position: 1st JULY 2005.
LAST MONTH, POSITION 363
Jan Timman, (1951-
)
Dutch Grandmaster. World Championship
Challenger. Endgame Composer A leading player since the mid
70s. He has won many top class events including Wijk aan Zee,
Linares, Amsterdam and Tilburg. In 1993, he lost a FIDE World Title
match against Karpov (+2-6=13).
Timman, 1980
White to play and DRAW
FEN:8/3K4/2p5/4p3/2P5/1B3pk1/8/8 w - -
0 1:
Black's passed pawns which will soon be connected are a
formidable force. White's position looks lost as his Bishop stands
badly and his counterattack against the opponent's c-pawn creating
his own passed pawn seems too slow. At the heart of this study is a
theoretical position (see note to 6.c3 below) which was "discovered"
over a hundred years ago and which is well worth remembering because
it often appears in practical Q&P endings.
Normally the side with a pawn two squares away from queening would
lose easily. But if the Queen and King are unfavourably placed
obstructing each other, a pawn on the 6th rank guarded by its King
can draw.
1.c5! ...
White's only hope lies in advancing the
c-pawn.
1.Bd1? c5! 2.Kc6 e4
3.Kxc5 e3-+;
1... e4
2.Bd1! ...
White is going to give up the Bishop for the f3
pawn. This also has the effect of forcing the Black King to an
unfavourable square as we shall see later.
2.Kxc6? e3 3.Bd5 e2
4.Bxf3 e1Q (4...Kxf3? 5.Kd7 e1Q 6.c6=) 5.Kd7 Qd2+ 6.Kc8 Kf4! (
6...Kxf3? 7.c6= ) 7.c6 Ke5 8.c7 Qb4! 9.Kd7 Qd6+ 10.Kc8 Qb6! 11.Kd7
Qe6+ 12.Kd8 Kd6 13.c8N+ Kc5 WINS;
2... e3
3.Bxf3 Kxf3
4.Kxc6 e2
5.Kd7! ...
This is the only move to draw.
5.Kb6?
e1Q 6.c6 Qb4+ 7.Ka7 Qc5+ 8.Kb7 Qb5+ 9.Kc7 Ke4+-;
5.Kd6? e1Q 6.c6 Kf4
7.c7 Qe8+-;
5... e1Q
6.c6 ...
This is an important
theoretical position which has been known since H.F.L. Meyer had a study published in an Italian magazine in 1884
!! (Here the advanced pawn was an f-pawn instead of a c-pawn). Apart
from the Timman composition this theme has appeared in a number of
studies since then. The Black King is unfavourably placed at "f3"
because it blocks the d1-h5 diagonal. If the King had been at "g3"
then Black would have the winning checks 6....Qd1+ 7.Kc8 6...Qg4+ and
the pawn could have been stopped from advancing to "c7". The King
would have been forced to occupy this square, driven there by the
Queen checks, thus blocking the advance of the c-pawn. The Black King
could therefore advance towards the enemy pawn thus securing the win.
6... Qd2+
7.Kc8! Draw.
The pawn will reach "c7" and White obtains a
theoretically drawn position.
Gens Una Sumus
8X8 Basic Endings for
Success
Rueben Fine,
1941
|
White to move: 1.Nc6! Kf2 2.Kd6 Bg3+
3.Kc5 Bc7 4.Kb5 Ke3 5.Ka6 Ke4 6.Kb7+-; White wins as the Bishop is forced of
the diagonal.
Black to move: 1...Kf2 2.Nc6 Ke3
3.Kd6 Bg3+ 4.Kc5 Bc7 5.Kb5 Ke4 6.Ka6 Kd5 7.Kb7 Kd6=;
The King arrives just in time to support the
Bishop.
|
I would like to briefly summarise the type of
endings found on the site. These are; (a) Basic endings. (b)
Practical chess endings. (c) The Endgame study.
All these are
interrelated and important and you cannot understand (b) or (c)
without a knowledge of (a).
(a) Basic
Endings. These are theoretical positions
in which we know the correct result with optimum play by both sides.
They may consist of three pawns or less and also include all the
non-pawn and five piece endings which have now been extensively
analysed by computer and of which we have tablebases. In the days
when we had adjournments some of these endings could be looked up in
text books to give us some idea how to play the position. As we no
longer can do this, knowledge and memory of these endings has become
important in practical play. Fundamental Chess Endings (2001) by Muller and Lamprecht
and Basic Endings
(1992) by Balashov and Prandstetter and the earlier
A Pocket Guide to Chess
Endgames (1970)
by David Hooper are good introductions to
these endings.
(b) Practical
Endings. These occur in over-the-board play where
usually more pawns are present. The above ending is an example of
this type. Some of these endings are in the process of being
transformed to basic endings but often they finish before this stage
is reached. Endgame strategy is very different from the middlegame
and has its own set of rules and exceptions. Fine's book
Basic Chess
Endings (1941,2003) recently revised by Pal
Benko and Batsford Chess
Endings (1993) by
Speelman, Tisdall and Wade are about basic and practical endings and
both can be recommended.
(c) Endgame
Studies. These are positions which have
been composed and will contain elements of one or both of the above
types of endings. But there are important differences between
these types and the study, such as artistic form and economy of
construction. An endgame study has to follow strict rules of
composition, especially if it is entered into a composing
competition. One of these rules states there should only be one
solution. If there is an unintended second solution then the study is
unsound and said to be "cooked".
Endgame studies are
important to the practical player because they enhance his
imagination and help him learn and enjoy areas of theory without too
much effort.
John Nunn's Endgame
Challenge (2002)
is an excellent introduction to using endgame
studies as a training tool. Walter Korn's American Chess Art (1995) is a basic introduction to the endgame study
and a more
comprehensive work is John Roycroft's Test Tube
Chess (1972).
Pre 18/04/04
Archives
mailto:
brigosling@aol.com
BRIAN'S CHESS
LINKS
ARCHIVES